Peru's Congress has introduced a new dress code banning female staff from wearing miniskirts, jeans, shorts, and sneakers during work hours. This directive, which applies to approximately 3,500 female employees, has sparked nationwide debate over issues of gender, professionalism, and individual rights.
While Congress previously encouraged modest attire for its staff, this marks the first time specific clothing items have been explicitly prohibited. The new rules, however, exclude the 130 female members of Congress, who are not subject to these restrictions. To ensure awareness, the Human Resources Department and Congress administration have displayed posters detailing the policy. Violations may result in disciplinary action, further fueling public outcry.
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, with many viewing it as a reflection of patriarchal attitudes. Congresswoman Susel Paredes openly condemned the move, questioning its relevance to legislative priorities. “Is Congress a religious institution? Wearing a miniskirt doesn’t disrespect anyone,” she remarked, underscoring the sentiment that such regulations divert attention from more pressing national concerns.
Public reactions have been divided. Many argue that the dress code infringes upon women’s rights and perpetuates gender stereotypes. A significant portion of the public perceives the policy as unnecessary and regressive, suggesting it undermines efforts toward workplace equality. However, others have expressed support, asserting that formal dress standards are appropriate for an institution as important as Congress. A supporter of the policy commented, “Congress is a state institution and should maintain a formal atmosphere, even if other workplaces permit casual attire.”
The new dress code has reignited broader conversations about gender equity, workplace decorum, and personal freedom in Peru. Critics assert that such measures disproportionately target women and overlook the larger issues of systemic inequality. Meanwhile, Congress maintains that the policy aims to uphold a professional environment.
The long-term impact of this decision on workplace dynamics and societal perceptions of women’s attire remains uncertain. For now, the move has amplified ongoing debates about the intersection of tradition, modernity, and individual liberties in professional spaces.